-
1.
A randomized controlled trial of an oral probiotic to reduce antepartum group B Streptococcus colonization and gastrointestinal symptoms.
Hanson, L, VandeVusse, L, Forgie, M, Malloy, E, Singh, M, Scherer, M, Kleber, D, Dixon, J, Hryckowian, AJ, Safdar, N
American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM. 2023;5(1):100748
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Streptococcus agalactiae (or group B Streptococcus [GBS]) is an encapsulated, gram-positive, beta-haemolytic anaerobe that asymptomatically colonizes the genitourinary tract. Vertical transmission of GBS during normal vaginal birth can lead to neonatal colonization and risk for early-onset GBS disease. The aim of this study was to present the findings of a phase II, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of an antenatal probiotic intervention to reduce GBS colonization. A secondary aim was to determine if the probiotic intervention reduces gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of pregnancy. Participants (n=107) were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: probiotic intervention (n=55) or placebo group (n=54). Results show that: - there weren’t any significant differences between the groups in demographic characteristics, perinatal or neonatal outcomes, or intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis doses. - there wasn’t any significant difference between groups in the presence of the probiotic bacteria on the rectal swabs, whereas the vaginal swabs showed a trend toward greater presence in probiotic group participants. - more probiotic participants took antenatal antibiotics (5/39) compared with controls (1/44). Authors conclude that probiotic bacteria colonisation of the genitourinary tract occurred more in the intervention group than in the control group and significantly reduced GI symptoms of pregnancy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics have been suggested as a strategy to reduce antenatal group B Streptococcus colonization. Although probiotics are known to improve gastrointestinal symptoms, this has not been studied during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a probiotic to reduce: (1) standard-of-care antenatal group B Streptococcus colonization and colony counts and (2) gastrointestinal symptoms of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN In a double-blind fashion, 109 healthy adult pregnant people were randomized to Florajen3 probiotic or placebo capsules once daily from 28 weeks' gestation until labor onset. Baseline vaginal and rectal study swabs for group B Streptococcus colony-forming units and microbiome analysis were collected at 28 and 36 weeks' gestation. Standard-of-care vaginal to rectal group B Streptococcus swabs were collected from all participants at 36 weeks' gestation and determined the need for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Data collection included solicitation of adverse events, demographic information, Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptom Assessment score, yogurt ingestion, sexual activity, and vaginal cleaning practices. RESULTS A total of 83 participants completed the study to 36 weeks' gestation with no adverse events. Standard-of-care group B Streptococcus colonization was 20.4% in the control group and 15.4% in probiotic group participants (-5%; P=.73). The relative risk for positive standard-of-care vaginal-rectal group B Streptococcus colonization was 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-3.40) times higher in the control group than in the probiotic group (P=.55). There were no differences in median vaginal (P=.16) or rectal (P=.20) group B streptococcus colony-forming units at baseline or at 36 weeks (vaginal P>.999; rectal P=.56). Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptom Assessment scores were similar at baseline (P=.19), but significantly decreased in probiotic group participants at 36 weeks (P=.02). No covariates significantly altered group B Streptococcus colonization. Significantly more Florajen3 bacteria components were recovered from the vaginal-rectal samples of probiotic group participants (32%; P=.04) compared with controls. CONCLUSION The findings of this study provided insufficient evidence for the clinical application of the Florajen3 probiotic intervention to reduce standard-of-care vaginal-rectal group B Streptococcus colonization. The prevalence of group B Streptococcus was lower than expected in the study population, and intervention adherence was poor. Probiotic bacteria colonization of the genitourinary tract occurred more in intervention group participants than in controls and significantly reduced gastrointestinal symptoms of pregnancy.
-
2.
Probiotic interventions to reduce antepartum Group B streptococcus colonization: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hanson, L, VandeVusse, L, Malloy, E, Garnier-Villarreal, M, Watson, L, Fial, A, Forgie, M, Nardini, K, Safdar, N
Midwifery. 2022;:103208
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review and meta-analyse studies of the efficacy of probiotics to reduce antenatal Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonisation. PARTICIPANTS Antenatal participants with known positive GBS colonisation or unknown GBS status. INTERVENTION Probiotic interventions containing species of Lactobacillus or Streptococcus. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS The systematic review included 10 studies. Five articles contained in vitro studies of probiotic interventions to determine antagonistic activity against GBS. Six clinical trials of probiotics to reduce antenatal GBS were systematically reviewed and meta-analysed. The meta-analysis revealed that the use of an antenatal probiotic decreased the probability of a positive GBS result by 44% (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 8.7%, 194.1%, p = 0.02) (n = 709). However, only one clinical trial of 10 had a low risk of bias. KEY CONCLUSIONS The probiotic interventions subjected to in vitro testing showed antagonistic activity against GBS through the mechanisms of acidification, immune modulation, and adhesion. The findings of the meta-analysis of the clinical trials revealed that probiotics are a moderately effective intervention to reduce antenatal GBS colonisation. More well-controlled trials with diverse participants and with better elucidation of variables influencing GBS colonisation rates are needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Probiotic interventions appear to be a safe and effective primary prevention strategy for antenatal GBS colonisation. Application of this low-risk intervention needs more study but may reduce the need for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis in countries or regions where antenatal GBS screening is used. Midwives can be instrumental in conducting and supporting larger well-controlled clinical trials.
-
3.
The role of the gut microbiome in colonization resistance and recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection.
Seekatz, AM, Safdar, N, Khanna, S
Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology. 2022;:17562848221134396
Abstract
UNLABELLED The species composition of the human gut microbiota is related to overall health, and a healthy gut microbiome is crucial in maintaining colonization resistance against pathogens. Disruption of gut microbiome composition and functionality reduces colonization resistance and has been associated with several gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal diseases. One prime example is Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and subsequent recurrent infections that occur after the development of systemic antibiotic-related dysbiosis. Standard-of-care antibiotics used for both acute and recurrent infections do not address dysbiosis and often worsen the condition. Moreover, monoclonal antibodies, recommended in conjunction with standard-of-care antibiotics for the prevention of recurrent CDI in patients at high risk of recurrence, reduce recurrences but do not address the underlying dysbiosis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an evolving therapeutic strategy in which microbes are harvested from healthy donor stool and transplanted into the gut of a recipient to restore the gut microbiome. Although effective in the prevention of recurrent CDI, some existing challenges include screening and the standardization of stool acquisition and processing. Recent safety alerts by the US Food and Drug Administration raised concern about the possibility of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 via FMT. Increased knowledge that microbes are beneficial in restoring the gut microbiome has led to the clinical development of several newer biotherapeutic formulations that are more regulated than FMT, which may allow for improved restoration of the gut microbiome and prevention of CDI recurrence. This review focuses on mechanisms by which gut microbiome restoration could influence colonization resistance against the pathogen C. difficile. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Clostridioides difficile Infection Introduction: A rich and diverse gut microbiome is key to immune system regulation and colonization resistance against pathogens.A disruption in the gut microbiome composition can make the gut more vulnerable to diseases such as Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), caused by the bacterium C. difficile.CDI management presents a therapeutic dilemma, as it is usually treated with antibiotics that can treat the infection but also can damage the microbiome.Treatment of CDI using antibiotics can further reduce microbial diversity and deplete beneficial bacteria from the gut leading to a condition called dysbiosis.Antibiotic treatment can be followed by therapies that restore the gut microbiota, boost colonization resistance, and prevent the development of antimicrobial resistance.It is important to evaluate treatment options to determine their safety and effectiveness. Methods: The researchers provided an overview of the mechanisms that the gut microbiome uses to prevent colonization of the gut by pathogens.They subsequently reviewed the efficacy and shortcomings of the following treatments for CDI: - Antibiotics- Monoclonal antibodies- Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) Results: Commensal intestinal bacteria prevent colonization of the gut by pathogens using mechanisms such as: - Competition for key nutrients- Production of inhibitory bile acids- Short-chain fatty acid production- Lowering the luminal pH- Production of bacteriocinsAntibiotic therapy is recommended as a standard treatment for CDI. However, patients are vulnerable to recurrent CDI after discontinuation of the therapy.Monoclonal antibodies that inactivate C. difficile toxins may be recommended along with antibiotics to prevent recurrent CDI. However, this approach does not restore the microbiome.FMT is one method of microbial restoration, where stool is harvested from a healthy donor and transplanted into a patient's colon.Although FMT has shown some efficacy in the treatment of recurrent CDI, the procedure is not standardized.Safety concerns have been raised about the possibility of transmission of multidrug-resistant pathogens via FMT. Conclusion: Treatment methods that can efficiently restore the diversity of the gut microbiome are crucial in preventing recurrence of CDI.
-
4.
Review of the use of nasal and oral antiseptics during a global pandemic.
Stathis, C, Victoria, N, Loomis, K, Nguyen, SA, Eggers, M, Septimus, E, Safdar, N
Future microbiology. 2021;(2):119-130
Abstract
A review of nasal sprays and gargles with antiviral properties suggests that a number of commonly used antiseptics including povidone-iodine, Listerine®, iota-carrageenan and chlorhexidine should be studied in clinical trials to mitigate both the progression and transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Several of these antiseptics have demonstrated the ability to cut the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 by 3-4 log10 in 15-30 s in vitro. In addition, hypertonic saline targets viral replication by increasing hypochlorous acid inside the cell. A number of clinical trials are in process to study these interventions both for prevention of transmission, prophylaxis after exposure, and to diminish progression by reduction of viral load in the early stages of infection.
-
5.
Pre-operative Decolonization as a Strategy to Reduce Surgical Site Infection.
Pop-Vicas, A, Safdar, N
Current infectious disease reports. 2019;(10):35
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To identify the most common strategies currently used for S. aureus decolonization and surgical site infection (SSI) prevention. RECENT FINDINGS Pre-operative colonization with Staphylococcus aureus increases SSI risk. Screening and decolonization with intra-nasal mupirocin and pre-operative chlorhexidine bathing remains the most common and effective strategy, especially for orthopedic and cardiovascular surgery. Intra-nasal povidone-iodine immediately before surgery appears effective in preliminary studies, is less expensive, and may be easier to implement in the clinical setting. Future well-designed clinical research studies are needed to confirm its effectiveness in SSI prevention. Intra-nasal alcohol-based antisepsis and photodynamic therapy are promising strategies that deserve further study before they can be clinically applied to SSI prevention. Decolonization with intra-nasal mupirocin or povidone-iodine, in addition to pre-operative chlorhexidine bathing, is an important SSI prevention strategy. Future studies should address optimal dosing, timing, and number of applications for each regimen.
-
6.
Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 on carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: results of the impact of probiotics for reducing infections in veterans (IMPROVE) study.
Eggers, S, Barker, AK, Valentine, S, Hess, T, Duster, M, Safdar, N
BMC infectious diseases. 2018;18(1):129
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is found in the digestive tract, nostrils, mouth and armpits. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is responsible for several difficult-to-treat infections in humans. Probiotics are emerging as an alternative to antibiotics in preventing or treating bacterial infections. This randomised controlled trial aimed to determine the ability of Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus) HN001 to reduce S. aureus at several different body sites. Participants in the study were mostly male, with an average age of 64 years, and all carriers of S. aureus in one or more body sites. Participants were organised into groups depending on whether S. aureus was found within the gastrointestinal tract (GI) or in other body sites (extra-GI), and given either L. rhamnosus HN001 probiotic, or a placebo for four weeks. Subjects given the probiotic had 15% lower levels of S. aureus in their stool samples than those given the placebo at the end of the trial. They also had 73% reduced odds of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) presence, and 83% reduced odds of any S. aureus presence in the stool sample compared to the placebo group. No other sampling sites showed a significant difference in colonisation between the two groups. The authors concluded that use of daily oral L. rhamnosus HN001 reduced odds of carriage of S. aureus in the GI tract, however it did not eradicate S. aureus from other body sites. The results of the study support the use of this probiotic strain for reducing the population of S. aureus in the gut. Further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of different probiotic strains and to compare probiotics with antibiotics in reducing S. aureus in other body sites.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infection by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Colonization by S. aureus increases the risk of infection. Little is known about decolonization strategies for S. aureus beyond antibiotics, however probiotics represent a promising alternative. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus) HN001 in reducing carriage of S. aureus at multiple body sites. METHODS One hundred thirteen subjects, positive for S. aureus carriage, were recruited from the William S. Middleton Memorial Medical Center, Madison, WI, USA, and randomized by initial site of colonization, either gastrointestinal (GI) or extra-GI, to 4-weeks of oral L. rhamnosus HN001 probiotic, or placebo. Nasal, oropharyngeal, and axillary/groin swabs were obtained, and serial blood and fecal samples were collected. Differences in prevalence of S. aureus carriage at the end of the 4-weeks of treatment were assessed. RESULTS The probiotic and placebo groups were similar in age, gender, and health history at baseline. S. aureus colonization within the stool samples of the extra-GI group was 15% lower in the probiotic than placebo group at the endpoint of the trial. Those in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group had 73% reduced odds (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-0.98) of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus presence, and 83% reduced odds (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.73) of any S. aureus presence in the stool sample at endpoint. CONCLUSION Use of daily oral L. rhamnosus HN001 reduced odds of carriage of S. aureus in the GI tract, however it did not eradicate S. aureus from other body sites. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01321606 . Registered March 21, 2011.
-
7.
Impact of Probiotics for Reducing Infections in Veterans (IMPROVE): Study protocol for a double-blind, randomized controlled trial to reduce carriage of Staphylococcus aureus.
Eggers, S, Barker, A, Valentine, S, Hess, T, Duster, M, Safdar, N
Contemporary clinical trials. 2017;:39-45
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is an organism of great public health importance, causing 20,000 deaths annually. Decolonization of patients with S. aureus may prevent infections, yet current options are limited to antimicrobials that promote antibiotic resistance and can cause adverse side effects. Probiotics have potential to reduce colonization of pathogenic bacteria, representing a promising alternative for S. aureus decolonization, but thus far lack rigorous evaluation. METHODS Potential subjects were recruited from inpatient and outpatient settings within a VA medical center and screened for S. aureus gastrointestinal (GI) or extra-GI colonization using swabs at multiple body sites. Positive, eligible, consenting participants were stratified by colonization site and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 4-weeks of daily placebo or Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus) HN001 probiotic treatment. Blood and stool samples, and treatment adherence reports were collected from each subject throughout the study, along with a final set of swabs at study completion to detect S. aureus carriage. The outcomes of this study are GI or extra-GI carriage by S. aureus at the end of 4weeks of therapy, change in phagocytic activity of polymorphonuclear cells from pre-intervention to post-intervention, and symptomatic S. aureus infection at any site during the study period. CONCLUSION 114 participants have been recruited for this study. Analysis of outcomes is underway. This is the first clinical trial to examine the efficacy of L. rhamnosus HN001 for decolonization of S. aureus, and investigates the mechanism by which L. rhamnosus HN001 mediates its effect on S. aureus colonization. ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier NCT01321606.
-
8.
Probiotics for Treatment and Prevention of Urogenital Infections in Women: A Systematic Review.
Hanson, L, VandeVusse, L, Jermé, M, Abad, CL, Safdar, N
Journal of midwifery & women's health. 2016;(3):339-55
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Probiotics are a complementary and integrative therapy useful in the treatment and prevention of urogenital infections in women. This study extends the work of researchers who systematically investigated the scientific literature on probiotics to prevent or treat urogenital infections. METHODS A systematic review was conducted to determine the efficacy of probiotics for prevention and/or treatment of urogenital infections in adult women from January 1, 2008, through June 30, 2015. We searched in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Dissertations and Theses, and Alt-HealthWatch. After removing duplicates and studies that did not meet inclusion criteria, 20 studies were reviewed. All included at least one species of Lactobacillus probiotic as an intervention for treatment or prevention of urogenital infections. Data extracted included samples, settings, study designs, intervention types, reported outcomes, follow-up periods, and results. We evaluated all randomized controlled trials for risk of bias and made quality appraisals on all studies. RESULTS Fourteen of the studies focused on bacterial vaginosis (BV), 3 on urinary tract infections (UTIs), 2 on vulvovaginal candidiasis, and one on human papillomavirus (HPV) as identified on Papanicolaou test. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of design, intervention, and outcomes. Four studies were of good quality, 9 of fair, and 7 poor. Probiotic interventions were effective for treatment and prevention of BV, prevention of recurrences of candidiasis and UTIs, and clearing HPV lesions. No study reported significant adverse events related to the probiotic intervention. DISCUSSION The quality of the studies in this systematic review varied. Although clinical practice recommendations were limited by the strength of evidence, probiotic interventions were effective in treatment and prevention of urogenital infections as alternatives or co-treatments. More good quality research is needed to strengthen the body of evidence needed for application by clinicians.
-
9.
Performance Characteristics of Galactomannan and β-d-Glucan in High-Risk Liver Transplant Recipients.
Singh, N, Winston, DJ, Limaye, AP, Pelletier, S, Safdar, N, Morris, MI, Meneses, K, Busuttil, RW, Wagener, MM, Wheat, LJ
Transplantation. 2015;(12):2543-50
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utility of Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) and β-D-glucan (BG) in liver transplant recipients remains uncertain. METHODS As part of a randomized, double-blind trial of antifungal prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients at risk for invasive fungal infections (IFIs), GM and BG were assessed in 199 patients at baseline (enrollment) and weekly thereafter for the duration of study drug. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the accuracy of these for the diagnosis of IFIs. RESULTS Overall, 46.4% of the patients at baseline had positive GM (index ≥ 0.5) and 89.6% had BG of 80 pg/mL or greater with BG level of 500 pg/mL or greater in 31.8%. Patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA) (3/3) had positive GM at baseline as did 45.5% of those without IA (P = 0.098); the area under the ROC curve for the diagnosis of IA was 0.77 (fair test, ie, good sensitivity but poor specificity). Using BG cutoff of 80 pg/mL or higher, 100% (12/12) of the patients with IFI had positive baseline BG and as did 88.9% (160/180) of those without IFI (P = 0.618); the area under the ROC curve for predicting IFIs was 0.56 (poor test). In multivariate analyses, GM positivity was associated with study site (P = 0.041), and BG positivity with renal replacement therapy (P = 0.05) and study site (P = 0.01). The GM and BG levels declined over time; positivity at subsequent time points was lower in comparison with baseline (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The GM and BG tests had significant center variability and limited accuracy for the diagnosis of IFIs in high-risk liver transplant recipients.
-
10.
Feasibility of oral prenatal probiotics against maternal group B Streptococcus vaginal and rectal colonization.
Hanson, L, Vandevusse, L, Duster, M, Warrack, S, Safdar, N
Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN. 2014;(3):294-304
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of an oral prenatal probiotic on group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization and to demonstrate the feasibility of a larger randomized controlled trial. DESIGN This pilot study was an open-label, two-group quasi-experiment. SETTING An urban central city nurse-midwifery and wellness center serving a diverse population. PARTICIPANTS Ten pregnant participants received the oral probiotic (Florajen3) taken once daily, and 10 participants served as controls. METHODS A questionnaire on dietary practices, vaginal cleansing, sexual history, and symptoms and GBS colony count samples were taken at 28-, 32-, and 36-weeks gestation. RESULTS Participants in the probiotic group reported no adverse events or minor side effects; one half reported improved gastrointestinal symptoms. Although two women in each group had positive qualitative prenatal GBS cultures at 36 weeks, the probiotic group participants had lower quantitative GBS colony counts. The eight GBS negative averaged 90% probiotic adherence compared with two GBS positive women who averaged 68%. Yogurt ingestion was inversely related (p = .02) to GBS colonization. CONCLUSIONS Prenatal probiotic therapy has the potential to reduce GBS colonization. The potential of the probiotic intervention appears to be linked to daily adherence. A controlled clinical trial with a larger, adequately powered sample is feasible and justified.